Larry Flynt : The Right to be Left Alone(2007) / Documentary by Joan Brooker-Marks

In order to make a break from my short story, Donner, I'm as of now coming back with a review on a documentary about the reknown and controversial porn publisher, Larry Flynt, probably in stark contrast to the Milos Forman biopic, The People VS Larry Flynt. As a picture in itself, it's actually a remarkable documentary, making and showing the true day-to-day life of the satirical creator of Hustler magazine, and stauch free-speech activist, Larry Flynt, in the most objective way possible, without looking forward to romanticize his exploits like the Milos Forman film. So this is why, I cordially invite you to see it, because in this link you'll see the movie in it's entirety.

Brooker-Marks, does a fantastic job of retelling the eccenctric publisher's life, while still being oriented in his liberal politics, and everything that was quite as much the corner stone of his publishing career. For a documentary, it incisively portrays the man's life along with his free-speech activism and satire, relating the career of his magazine, and also his "hell and back" story, that he lived through numerous incarcerations, due to the publication of "indecent material" that was his own Hustler. The documentarian relates however in rather small clippings to us, the viewer, of the history of Hustler, when he could have made the subject more broaden. Although, he summarizes rather too much the life of Larry Flynt, without going as much as what made the man so damn interesting by himself. Flynt, in his present moment, as the personal raconteur of his life, confesses to us in a slow and disabused fashion, almost as he would want the documentary to end over with, so he can resume his life as quickly as he can. As I was mostly interested into the man, nor his politics or his publishing life, the only thing we get,are his liberal politics that completely imerges his way of thinking, as much as being the dominant school of thought of Hustler magazine.

Thoughout the documentary,we see his younger self, through a lot of the numerous news and trial archives, that happens to speak for him more than probably ever, in a rough, uncomprimising and uncomplicated way, which was the simple, brash and spontaneous southern way that made Flynt, such a remarkable character. In a sympathetic light that is casted upon Flynt, by it's director Joan Brooker-Marks, we can definitely see through the old 70's footage, that Flynt lived most of his life as a misunderstood man, or just a man that just wanted to earn an easy living, through what he liked best : women. Brooker-Marks delivers to us, in an unfiltered fashion of objectivity, the genesis of Hustler, as a newsletter for a stripper bar of the same name Hustler's Cocktails and Bar, maintained by the Flynt brothers: Jimmy and Larry. The bar in this small town that had all the renmants of a small burlesque house, left out in the open. We can see that the amount of persecution that befalls upon Flynt, is nothing short of staggering, almost that the man could face prison for simply walking down the street. Flynt couldn't do anything without being prosecuted for it, and in the end, losing or winning a case, and facing long jail sentences like he was nothing more than a hardened criminal. Flynt faced a trial for anything. It could only be a matter of time, as it seemed, that he would face a trial for breathing. As a Canadian movie critic and writer of mostly all genres, upon watching this, you can't help to think that this sort of pathetic nonsense, is just absolutely insane, but those were the times. As any viewer, you would think to yourself: «God, this isn't right. Just let him do what he wants to do. At least, he's not doing child porn. Don't jail him for nothing in my name. » Or on the other hand, people wouldn't easily feel sympathy in his regard.  So just let those times, being long gone and buried, even for the 60's or 70's.

In the Milos Forman film, Woody Harrelson portrays Flynt, as a man who lives in day-in and day-out through courts, like he was the People's personal scapegoat, for everything that was wrong in their society. Really, how can one man do that, even if he made a porn magazine ? It seems just too ridiculous to be real, in some points.

Even when I visit the U.S, things just don't easily change. Christianity is still hugely dominant over there, and to illustrate an example, one would be spending the night in a standard motel room, in New Jersey. When you open the TV in that said motel room, in all of the 96 channels, excluding Home Box Office, fifteen of them would show christian mass, or an interview with a priest in monk garment. Religion is to the point dominant, that it is forcefed into you.  If it was up to me, I could only live comfortably in two states : California and New York, and that's mostly it.

It's sad, but people shouldn't be making this their problem.

So, Brooker-Marks doesn't focus more on the christian right or conservatives, that focus more on wanting to control Larry Flynt at all costs. And in the end, in Flynt's life, he escaped everyone's control, as much as in the documentary, by becoming less of a pornographer, and more of a liberal-minded journalist. Funnily enough, by becoming a journalist, Flynt overcame everything, maybe he was all this time, a "frustrated journalist".     

 A fantastic documentary, which is nevertheles a must see.

Larry Flint : The Right to be Left Alone
4.0*/5

M.L

Octobre 9th, 2011

Messages les plus consultés de ce blogue

Hollow Man(2000) - Bande Annonce de Maxime Laperle

Mégantic : un poème descriptif - 10 juillet 2013

L’art du débat : ma première expérience à VOXTV